Skip to content

EducationCalifornia6 min read

California Lawmakers Rush to Pass Key Education Bills by Deadline

Share

Topics

Sacramento Capital Building
Sacramento Capital Building

California Lawmakers Rush to Pass Major Education Bills, Including CA Dream Act Revisions and Teacher Salary Bill, Ahead of September Deadline

 

Sacramento, California (High Desert News Online) – California lawmakers are sprinting to pass major education bills — including revisions to the CA Dream Act and a teacher salary measure — before the Sept. 12, 2026 deadline to send measures to Governor Gavin Newsom’s desk.

 

Key takeaways

 

  • Tight timeline: Appropriations must act after policy deadlines with key hearings Aug. 20 and votes by Aug. 29 to meet the September 12 timeline and internal targets.
  • High-cost measures: A proposed teacher salary bill faces multi‑billion dollar projections and sits on the appropriations suspense file, risking delay or phased implementation (teacher salary bill).
  • Advancing agenda: Bills moving include SB 323, CSU direct‑admission expansions, SB 790 (SARA), charter reforms and literacy mandates.

 

Main coverage

 

Overview of the late‑session sprint

Lawmakers returned to the Capitol for a late‑session push after policy deadlines passed. In even‑numbered years, the California Constitution sets Aug. 31 as the general bill passage deadline, but many education measures are targeting the later internal date — September 12 — the day bills must be sent to the governor. Appropriations committees will assess fiscal impacts before final votes; this process includes hearings planned for Aug. 20 and votes in Appropriations by Aug. 29 to meet the schedule (hearings set for August 20 and votes in appropriations by August 29).

 

Why the rush matters

The sprint matters because many proposals carry large price tags or structural changes. Appropriations panels often place costly measures on a “suspense file”, delaying action while fiscal impacts are examined. That procedural step can create a bottleneck: bills with broad policy support may still stall if projected costs are significant (creates a bottleneck).

 

Key bills advancing

Several notable measures were slated for appropriations review; below are summaries and committee notes.

  • SB 323 (Sen. Sasha Renée Pérez, D‑Pasadena) — CA Dream Act revisions: Would broaden the California Dream Act application so any student eligible for state aid can apply even if not eligible for federal aid; sponsored by the California Student Aid Commission and reported with no recorded opposition. Scheduled for an Assembly Appropriations hearing on Aug. 20 (SB 323).
  • Teacher salary bill — pay equity push: Aimed at raising teacher pay in light of an estimated 23.5% gap versus comparable college graduates. The bill passed the Assembly Education Committee unanimously on April 10 but was placed on the appropriations suspense file due to projected costs in the tens of billions through 2036–37; budget concerns could defer full hearings (Teacher salary bill).
  • Direct‑admission expansion (Sen. Christopher Cabaldon, D‑Napa) — CSU access: Would ease CSU direct admissions for qualified students, expanding pilots begun in 2024 and building dual‑admission pathways; supported by Los Angeles Unified and listed with no opponents. Slated for Aug. 20 Appropriations (Direct‑admission expansion).
  • SB 790 (Sen. Christopher Cabaldon, D‑Napa) — online course reciprocity (SARA): Would allow California to join the State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement while preserving student protections; California is currently the only non‑participating state. Scheduled for an Assembly Appropriations hearing on Aug. 20 (SB 790).
  • Immigration enforcement attendance rule: Proposal to let districts claim average daily attendance credit when enrollment drops 10%+ due to immigration enforcement, treating such losses similar to disasters and requiring independent study options through June 30, 2029 (Immigration enforcement attendance rule).
  • AB 84 (Muratsuchi) — charter school oversight: Would strengthen charter accountability with audits, stronger oversight and improved data systems following LAO, FCMAT and State Controller recommendations; passed the Assembly Education Committee 7–2 on April 30 (AB 84 (Muratsuchi) — charter school oversight).
  • AB 1454 — literacy and reading professional development: Late amendments added mandates for local education agencies to deliver literacy and reading professional development; heard in Assembly Education while printed text was still being finalized (AB 1454 — literacy and reading professional development).
  • AB 1468 (Muratsuchi‑related) — waiver for post‑deadline hearing: Received a waiver permitting an education committee hearing after the usual deadline due to ongoing negotiations (AB 1468 (Muratsuchi-related)).

 

Related omnibus and trailer bills

 

Fiscal reality and political context

Many proposals face the basic question: can the state afford them? Appropriations panels will focus on long‑term costs — notably the teacher salary bill’s projected multi‑billion‑dollar obligations through 2036–37. Lawmakers also consider gubernatorial signing patterns: Governor Newsom signed more than 800 bills by Oct. 13, 2025, including education measures, showing prior willingness to act on education. Ultimately, whether measures reach his desk by Sept. 12 depends on the pace of approvals and suspense‑file placements (Sept. 12).

 

What is likely to move quickly

Bills with strong agency sponsorship and no organized opposition are positioned to move faster. For example, SB 323’s backing by the California Student Aid Commission and the absence of formal opposition bolster its prospects. Measures tied to federal matching funds or that reduce administrative friction — such as SB 790 (SARA) or CSU direct‑admission expansions — may also advance if fiscal impacts are limited or offset.

 

What remains uncertain

The teacher salary bill is the most uncertain piece. While it addresses a clear pay gap — teachers earning roughly 23.5% less than comparable college graduates — its price tag placed it on the appropriations suspense file, meaning lawmakers may delay action or pursue phased approaches (teacher salary bill).

 

Prior session context

This late push follows a busy 2025 session: in 2025 Governor Newsom signed many bills, including education changes like SB 374 that adjusted reporting deadlines and compliance steps. That prior activity demonstrates action on education but each year’s budget and politics reshape what can pass and be implemented (SB 374 and the 2025 signing record).

 

Implications for the United States

  • National education policy and funding debates: California is the nation’s largest state; changes to the CA Dream Act or teacher pay could influence national conversations on immigrant access to higher education and teacher compensation.
  • Higher education admission practices: Expanding CSU direct admission and joining SARA for online courses could reshape access and interstate online enrollment patterns (Higher education admission practices).
  • Economic implications for workforce and taxes: A major teacher pay increase would ripple into local and state budgets and could become a model for other states, but large new spending could pressure budgets and tax debates (Economic implications for workforce and taxes).
  • Charter accountability and literacy standards: Moves to tighten charter oversight and mandate literacy training may inform national charter‑school debates and reading instruction standards (Charter accountability and literacy standards).
  • Immigration and school attendance policies: The proposed attendance credit for enrollment drops tied to immigration enforcement could set a precedent for balancing enforcement impacts and school funding (Immigration and school attendance policies).

 

Sources and further reading

 

Reporting note: As of late April 2026 there were no public records indicating outcomes after the Aug. 20 hearings or final actions by Governor Newsom; developments are expected through Sept. 12, 2026 (LAist; CA WibSIB).

Share

Topics

Chris Robertson

Raised in Moraga, California, Chris Robertson is a Sacramento contributor for Times Media Service. Robertson covers Sacramento news, including local government, public safety, schools and development, along with California transportation and energy, from major infrastructure projects to state energy policy. Robertson holds a master's degree in journalism.

Write to Chris