Skip to content

PoliticsUnited States4 min read

Hakeem Jeffries Slams Karoline Leavitt: “Sick, Out of Control”

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries called White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt "sick, demented, ignorant, and out of control" during a heated press conference.

Share

Topics

Jeffries lashes out at Karoline Leavitt, calls her “sick” and a “stone‑cold liar” amid government shutdown tensions

 

WASHINGTON (High Desert News Online) – House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries publicly and sharply rebuked White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt at a briefing tied to the 17‑day government shutdown, calling her “sick” and a “stone‑cold liar” over inflammatory Fox News remarks.

 

Key takeaways

  • Who: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.
  • What: Jeffries called Leavitt “sick, demented, ignorant, and out of control” and a “stone‑cold liar” after her Fox News comments.
  • Why: Leavitt’s televised statements that broadly characterized Democratic constituencies prompted a sharp response that many called a rebuke of extreme rhetoric.
  • When/Where: At a press briefing during government funding talks as the shutdown entered its 17th day; video circulated online.

 

What Jeffries said and why he said it

At the podium, Jeffries used blunt, personal language to condemn Leavitt’s Fox News appearance and the tone he said it represented. According to reporting and video, he said:

“She’s out of control, and I’m not sure whether she’s just demented, ignorant, a stone‑cold liar or all of the above.”

Jeffries also described Leavitt as “sick, demented, ignorant, and out of control,” language captured in a video posted by an international outlet and summarized in domestic reporting. He framed his remarks as a response to what he viewed as an attack on Democrats that crossed from partisan disagreement into inflammatory demonization.

 

What Leavitt said on Fox News

Reporters cited an AOL summary of Leavitt’s Fox News remarks, which attributed to her the statement that “The Democrat party’s main constituency is made up of Hamas terrorists, illegal aliens and violent criminals; that is who the Democrat party are catering to,” contrasting Democrats with the GOP as representing “law‑abiding Americans.” Those comments drew immediate condemnation and set the stage for Jeffries’ public rebuttal.

 

Context — government shutdown tensions and partisan heat

The exchange occurred as the government shutdown entered its 17th day, with budget talks deadlocked over issues including Affordable Care Act subsidy provisions. In that high‑pressure environment, charged rhetorical moments receive amplified attention and can distract from negotiations, as reporters noted in coverage.

 

Reactions from both sides

Democratic leaders framed Jeffries’ comments as a necessary rebuke of extreme rhetoric by a White House official and a defense of democratic norms. Conversely, some conservatives criticized Jeffries for his personal attacks and defended Leavitt’s concerns as legitimate commentary on policy and public safety.

 

Media spread and public response

Video of Jeffries’ rebuke circulated widely on cable news and social platforms. Clips and summaries amplified the clash beyond the briefing room, prompting debate over civility in politics and the role of press secretaries in shaping partisan narratives.

 

Implications for The High Desert, California

Local impacts of national shutdown tensions can be practical and political. Below are implications for residents and communities in the High Desert.

Economic impact

  • Federal services and national park operations could face delays, affecting tourism and local businesses.
  • Federal contractors and small businesses reliant on predictable federal funding may experience cash‑flow disruptions.
  • If ACA subsidy payments are part of the impasse, residents receiving premium assistance could face uncertainties.

Political consequences

  • Sharp national rhetoric may sharpen local partisan divides and influence voter priorities on fiscal responsibility and governance.
  • Personal attacks between national figures could either energize partisan bases or push voters toward calls for bipartisan problem‑solving.

Social effects

  • Heated rhetoric can filter into civic life, making public meetings and local discourse more contentious.
  • Residents with family in federal agencies or contracting jobs may feel immediate anxiety over pay and services.

Cultural relevance

  • The High Desert values practical results and community stability; public feuds that emphasize rhetoric over outcomes may clash with local expectations.

Practical applications for residents

  • Check agency websites and local notices for service availability and potential delays.
  • Consult insurers and local healthcare providers about contingency plans if ACA subsidy payments are affected.
  • Federal contractors and small businesses should assess short‑term cash‑flow strategies and contingency plans.

 

Reporting and sources

This article draws on publicly available video and reporting, including an international video compilation and domestic summaries. See coverage and clips at: Times of India video, AOL reporting, and a YouTube clip. Additional reporting and official transcripts may provide more context as negotiations and public reactions evolve.

 

Preserved facts and source links are included above; readers are encouraged to review original clips and reporting for full context.

Share

Topics

Ashlee Edwards

Ashlee Edwards is a senior national election reporter for Times Media Service, based in the Washington bureau. Edwards covers elections and national politics, including Congress, federal agencies and the policy decisions and political disputes shaping public life. Edwards holds a master's degree in political science and grew up in Victoria, British Columbia.

Write to Ashlee